$gel-type-touch-class confusing name

[howieweiner]

$gel-type-touch-class requires the class name of the NO touch class. Somewhat confusing

[shaunbent]

Would you prefer $gel-type-no-touch-class or $gel-type-no-touch-class-name?!?

I guess because I know what it does I never thought it might be a bit confusing.

[howieweiner]

$gel-type-no-touch-class is fine, but don't want this to become a breaking change.. unless you extend your logic to look for one or the other variable name?

[shaunbent]

Yeah I was thinking of allowing both variables and deprecating the existing one and throwing a warning if its used to suggest people upgrade to the new one.

[howieweiner]

👍 for the warning

[itsaljones]

Sounds good to me!