Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Excerpt Only feed #277

Closed
davidbstein opened this issue Jul 3, 2019 · 6 comments
Closed

Excerpt Only feed #277

davidbstein opened this issue Jul 3, 2019 · 6 comments

Comments

@davidbstein
Copy link

Many of my posts have interactive components that don't inline properly in the atom feed. Is there a way to introduce an "excerpt only" flag for posts that don't interact well with RSS readers?

@jekyllbot
Copy link
Contributor

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not been commented on for at least two months.

The resources of the Jekyll team are limited, and so we are asking for your help.

If this is a bug and you can still reproduce this error on the master branch, please reply with all of the information you have about it in order to keep the issue open.

If this is a feature request, please consider whether it can be accomplished in another way. If it cannot, please elaborate on why it is core to this project and why you feel more than 80% of users would find this beneficial.

This issue will automatically be closed in two months if no further activity occurs. Thank you for all your contributions.

@jekyllbot jekyllbot added the stale label Sep 4, 2019
@psfrolov
Copy link

psfrolov commented Sep 8, 2019

I would also like to see an ability to use excerpt-only feeds. Rendering whole article in atom is actually suitable only for very simple content. For example, I have the following problems with full articles in atom produced by jekyll-feed:

  • SVG diagrams are not rendered (broken image icon appears instead)
  • Most of styling (syntax hihlightning, typography features) are lost.
  • User is unable to comment on the article (no JavaScript).

@torrocus
Copy link
Contributor

torrocus commented Oct 7, 2019

I prepared PR to this feature. It's very basic, but worst is better.
#287

@torrocus
Copy link
Contributor

torrocus commented Nov 2, 2019

Hey! Is any of you (@pathawks & @DirtyF) still responsible for this project?

@ffes
Copy link

ffes commented Nov 8, 2019

With #287 merged this issue can be closed, right?

@ashmaroli
Copy link
Member

Yes, it can be closed. Thanks for letting us know @ffes

@jekyll jekyll locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 7, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants