Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Upgrade express from 4.20.0 to 4.21.0 #29

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 3, 2024

Conversation

2lambda123
Copy link
Owner

@2lambda123 2lambda123 commented Oct 3, 2024

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade express from 4.20.0 to 4.21.0.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


  • The recommended version is 1 version ahead of your current version.

  • The recommended version was released on 21 days ago.

Issues fixed by the recommended upgrade:

Issue Score Exploit Maturity
low severity Cross-site Scripting
SNYK-JS-SEND-7926862
391 No Known Exploit
Release notes
Package name: express from express GitHub release notes

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

Description by Korbit AI

What change is being made?

Upgrade the express package from version 4.20.0 to 4.21.0 in the package.json file.

Why are these changes being made?

This upgrade addresses potential security vulnerabilities and includes performance improvements and bug fixes introduced in the newer version of the express package. Keeping dependencies up-to-date ensures the application remains secure and efficient.

Is this description stale? Ask me to generate a new description by commenting /korbit-generate-pr-description

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade express from 4.20.0 to 4.21.0.

See this package in npm:
express

See this project in Snyk:
https://app.snyk.io/org/2lambda123/project/578cad6c-d03a-4972-ad5e-b2fa7910537e?utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&page=upgrade-pr
Copy link

cr-gpt bot commented Oct 3, 2024

Seems you are using me but didn't get OPENAI_API_KEY seted in Variables/Secrets for this repo. you could follow readme for more information

Micro-Learning Topic: Cross-site scripting (Detected by phrase)

Matched on "Cross-site Scripting"

What is this? (2min video)

Cross-site scripting vulnerabilities occur when unescaped input is rendered into a page displayed to the user. When HTML or script is included in the input, it will be processed by a user's browser as HTML or script and can alter the appearance of the page or execute malicious scripts in their user context.

Try a challenge in Secure Code Warrior

Helpful references

Copy link

git-greetings bot commented Oct 3, 2024

Thanks @2lambda123 for opening this PR!

For COLLABORATOR only :

  • To add labels, comment on the issue
    /label add label1,label2,label3

  • To remove labels, comment on the issue
    /label remove label1,label2,label3

Copy link

Unable to locate .performanceTestingBot config file

@labels-and-badges labels-and-badges bot added NO JIRA This PR does not have a Jira Ticket PR:size/L Denotes a Pull Request that changes 100-499 lines. labels Oct 3, 2024
Copy link

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We have skipped reviewing this pull request. Here's why:

  • It seems to have been created by a bot ('[Snyk]' found in title). We assume it knows what it's doing!
  • We don't review packaging changes - Let us know if you'd like us to change this.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 3, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Ignore keyword(s) in the title.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

quine-bot bot commented Oct 3, 2024

👋 Figuring out if a PR is useful is hard, hopefully this will help.

Their most recently public accepted PR is: 2lambda123/accumulo#64

Copy link

git-greetings bot commented Oct 3, 2024

PR Details of @2lambda123 in Accenture-mercury-nodejs :

OPEN CLOSED TOTAL
3 26 29

Copy link

codeautopilot bot commented Oct 3, 2024

PR summary

This Pull Request upgrades the Express library from version 4.20.0 to 4.21.0. The primary purpose of this upgrade is to address a low-severity cross-site scripting vulnerability identified by Snyk (SNYK-JS-SEND-7926862). The update also includes several dependency updates and deprecations, such as the deprecation of the "back" magic string in redirects and updates to dependencies like finalhandler, serve-static, and qs. This upgrade ensures that the project remains secure and up-to-date with the latest features and fixes provided by the Express framework.

Suggestion

Before merging, it would be prudent to run a full suite of tests to ensure that the upgrade does not introduce any breaking changes or regressions in the application. Additionally, reviewing the release notes for any deprecated features or changes in behavior that might affect the application would be beneficial. If possible, consider setting up automated dependency updates to streamline future upgrades and maintain security.

Disclaimer: This comment was entirely generated using AI. Be aware that the information provided may be incorrect.

Current plan usage: 5.47%

Have feedback or need help?
Discord
Documentation
[email protected]

Copy link
Contributor

penify-dev bot commented Oct 3, 2024

Failed to generate code suggestions for PR

Copy link

codesyncapp bot commented Oct 3, 2024

Check out the playback for this Pull Request here.

Copy link

New and removed dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

Package New capabilities Transitives Size Publisher
npm/[email protected] environment, filesystem, network Transitive: eval, unsafe +57 1.62 MB wesleytodd
npm/[email protected] environment, eval, unsafe Transitive: filesystem +8 2.56 MB kriszyp
npm/[email protected] None 0 86.2 kB typescript-bot
npm/[email protected] environment 0 675 kB eemeli

🚮 Removed packages: npm/[email protected], npm/[email protected]

View full report↗︎

Copy link

@korbit-ai korbit-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've completed my review and didn't find any issues.

Need a new review? Comment /korbit-review on this PR and I'll review your latest changes.

Korbit Guide: Usage and Customization

Interacting with Korbit

  • You can manually ask Korbit to review your PR using the /korbit-review command in a comment at the root of your PR.
  • You can ask Korbit to generate a new PR description using the /korbit-generate-pr-description command in any comment on your PR
  • Chat with Korbit on issues we post by tagging @korbit-ai in your reply.
  • Help train Korbit to improve your reviews by giving a 👍 or 👎 on the comments Korbit posts.

Customizing Korbit

  • Check out our docs on how you can make Korbit work best for you and your team.
  • Customize Korbit for your organization through the Korbit Console.

Current Korbit Configuration

General Settings
Setting Value
Review Schedule Automatic excluding drafts
Max Issue Count 10
Automatic PR Descriptions
Issue Categories
Category Enabled
Naming
Database Operations
Documentation
Logging
Error Handling
Systems and Environment
Objects and Data Structures
Tests
Readability and Maintainability
Asynchronous Processing
Design Patterns
Third-Party Libraries
Performance
Security
Functionality

Feedback and Support

@2lambda123 2lambda123 merged commit db1b95f into master Oct 3, 2024
24 of 28 checks passed
Copy link

@gitginie gitginie bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@2lambda123
Thank you for your contribution to this repository! We appreciate your effort in closing pull request.
Happy coding!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
korbit-code-analysis NO JIRA This PR does not have a Jira Ticket PR:size/L Denotes a Pull Request that changes 100-499 lines. size/XS
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants