Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Split violation matrix calculation #102

Closed
geneorama opened this issue Dec 18, 2017 · 0 comments
Closed

Split violation matrix calculation #102

geneorama opened this issue Dec 18, 2017 · 0 comments

Comments

@geneorama
Copy link
Member

Parse the violations and calculate the a history matrix, which can be used arbitrarily, then in a separate step group the violations into critical, serious, and minor.

geneorama added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 10, 2019
v1.7.0

 - Data file names now mirror the script names that created the files
 - Features on food inspections are now calculated separately
 - Features on business inspections are now calculated separately
 - The model code merges in the features, does not calculate features
 - Added script to adjust the public sanitarian data to match the schema of the private sanitarian file
 - More aggressive filtering functions
 - Separates out the violation matrix calculation into the parsing step and classification step (which, as it turns out will be useful for the new inspection format)
 - Refactoring model result / evaluation steps to accommodate future analysis


* adding prefix number to code and data, closes #100
* syncing and updating startup script, closes #101
* split violation matrix calculation into two steps, closes #102
* updated help example to remove unused variable
* adding nokey function, needed for new violation matrix calculation
* guard against too few categories in GenerateOtherLicenseInfo, closes 103
* updating filter functions to match model
* starting work described in #104 to split feature creation
* refactoring code for model compatibility
* simplifying initialization
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant