Add calendar webapp as an example

[lingalarahul7]

Description

Using OpenAI assistant, create an AI Calendar web app which can perform operations on your google calendar.

Testing

---

Important

Add a new AI Calendar web app example using Streamlit and OpenAI for Google Calendar management.

• New Feature:
  • Adds a new AI Calendar web app example in calendar_webapp directory.
  • Uses streamlit for the web interface and openai for AI operations.
• Setup and Configuration:
  • Adds setup.sh to create a virtual environment and install dependencies from requirements.txt.
  • Includes .env.example for environment variable configuration.
• Main Application:
  • main.py initializes AI clients and handles user tasks for Google Calendar.
  • Uses ComposioToolSet and OpenAI to process tasks and interact with Google Calendar.
• Documentation:
  • readme.md provides setup and execution instructions for the web app.

^{This description was created by for d22335a. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.}

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
composio	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Feb 22, 2025 11:36am

[shreysingla11]

The execute_calendar_task function should include error handling for API calls. Consider wrapping the OpenAI and Composio tool calls in try-except blocks to handle potential API errors gracefully.

[shreysingla11]

Consider adding docstrings to functions to improve code documentation. For example:

def execute_calendar_task(task, openai_client, composio_toolset):
    """
    Execute a calendar-related task using OpenAI and Composio tools.
    
    Args:
        task (str): The user's calendar task description
        openai_client: OpenAI client instance
        composio_toolset: ComposioToolSet instance
    
    Returns:
        dict: Result of the calendar operation
    """

[ellipsis-dev]

❌ Changes requested. Reviewed everything up to d22335a in 2 minutes and 31 seconds

More details

• Looked at 196 lines of code in 5 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 12 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. python/examples/advanced_agents/calendar_webapp/readme.md:3

• Draft comment:
  Capitalize 'Google' in 'google calendar' for consistency.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 30% <= threshold 50%
  None

2. python/examples/advanced_agents/calendar_webapp/main.py:18

• Draft comment:
  Verify model name: 'gpt-4o' may be a typo; confirm if it should be 'gpt-4'.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Marked as duplicate.

3. python/examples/advanced_agents/calendar_webapp/main.py:27

• Draft comment:
  Consider using st.write() to display the result in the UI instead of print().
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Marked as duplicate.

4. python/examples/advanced_agents/calendar_webapp/setup.sh:4

• Draft comment:
  Consider using a different virtual environment folder name to avoid potential conflicts with Python's standard 'calendar' module.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
  While it's technically true that 'calendar' is a Python standard library module name, virtual environment folder names are local to the project directory and don't interfere with Python imports. The venv name is just used for the folder structure and activation, not for Python imports. This seems like an overly cautious suggestion that wouldn't prevent any real problems.
  Maybe there could be some edge case where having a venv named 'calendar' causes confusion or issues with scripts that manipulate the environment? The suggestion isn't technically wrong.
  Virtual environments are isolated by design and their names are just local folders - there's no practical way this could conflict with the Python calendar module. The comment is overly cautious without clear benefit.
  Delete the comment as it suggests a change that wouldn't solve any real problems and falls into the category of being overly speculative without clear benefit.

5. python/examples/advanced_agents/calendar_webapp/requirements.txt:1

• Draft comment:
  Review the dependencies; many packages are included. Remove any that are not necessary for the webapp.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50%
  The comment is asking the PR author to review dependencies, which is not allowed according to the rules. It doesn't provide a specific suggestion or point out a specific issue with the dependencies.

6. python/examples/advanced_agents/calendar_webapp/readme.md:3

• Draft comment:
  Consider capitalizing 'google calendar' to 'Google Calendar' for consistency.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50% <= threshold 50%
  None

7. python/examples/advanced_agents/calendar_webapp/.env.example:2

• Draft comment:
  Add a newline at the end of the file for consistency.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 40% <= threshold 50%
  None

8. python/examples/advanced_agents/calendar_webapp/.env.example:2

• Draft comment:
  The file is missing a newline at the end. Adding a trailing newline can help maintain consistency across different tools and editors.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50%
  The comment is purely informative, suggesting adding a newline for consistency. It doesn't provide a specific code suggestion or ask for a test to be written. It doesn't align with the rules for good comments.

9. python/examples/advanced_agents/calendar_webapp/main.py:18

• Draft comment:
  Typographical error: The model name 'gpt-4o' might be a typo. Should it be 'gpt-4'?
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Marked as duplicate.

10. python/examples/advanced_agents/calendar_webapp/main.py:21

• Draft comment:
  Consider capitalizing 'Google Calendar' in the system message for proper noun consistency: "You are a helpful Google Calendar assistant."
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50%
  This is an extremely minor stylistic suggestion about capitalization in a string that will only be seen by the AI model. It doesn't affect functionality at all. The AI model will understand the context perfectly well either way. This feels like the kind of nitpicky comment that adds noise without value.
  Perhaps maintaining consistent branding and proper noun capitalization throughout the codebase is important for professionalism and documentation standards?
  While consistency is good, this is an internal system message string that users won't see, not user-facing text or documentation. The benefit is extremely minimal compared to the noise it adds to the review.
  This comment should be deleted as it's an extremely minor stylistic suggestion about an internal string that doesn't meaningfully impact code quality or user experience.

11. python/examples/advanced_agents/calendar_webapp/readme.md:3

• Draft comment:
  Typographical note: On line 3, consider capitalizing 'google calendar' to 'Google Calendar' since it is a proper noun.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50%
  While technically correct that Google Calendar should be capitalized as a proper noun, this is a very minor documentation issue. The meaning is completely clear either way. Our rules specifically say not to make comments that are obvious or unimportant. Documentation formatting suggestions like this don't require code changes and don't impact functionality.
  The proper capitalization of product names could be considered important for professionalism and consistency in documentation. Some might argue this reflects attention to detail.
  While professional documentation is good, this change is too minor to warrant a PR comment. The rules explicitly state not to make purely informative comments or comments about obvious things.
  This comment should be deleted as it's a minor documentation formatting suggestion that doesn't impact functionality or require meaningful code changes.

12. python/examples/advanced_agents/calendar_webapp/requirements.txt:1

• Draft comment:
  Please double-check the package name 'aiohappyeyeballs' on line 1. It looks unusual and might be a typographical error. If it's correct, perhaps consider adding a comment explaining its purpose to avoid confusion.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50%
  The comment asks the PR author to double-check the package name, which violates the rule against asking the author to confirm or double-check things. It also suggests adding a comment for clarification, which is not a direct code suggestion or request for a test. Therefore, this comment should be removed.

Workflow ID: wflow_B6ZDrTbfQlAOPZWO

---

Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

[ellipsis-dev]

Check model name 'gpt-4o' – is this a typo of 'gpt-4'?

Suggested change

	model="gpt-4o",
	model="gpt-4",

[ellipsis-dev]

Result is printed to console. Consider displaying it using Streamlit (e.g., st.write) for better UX.

Suggested change

	print(result)
	st.write(result)

[ellipsis-dev]

Add error handling (try-except) around the API call to handle potential exceptions.

[shreysingla11]

Code Review Summary

Overall, this is a good example application that demonstrates Composio's calendar integration capabilities. Here's a breakdown of the review:

Strengths:

• Well-structured example with clear separation of concerns
• Good environment variable handling
• Comprehensive requirements.txt with pinned versions
• Clear setup instructions in readme.md
• Clean and minimal UI implementation with Streamlit

Areas for Improvement:

1. Critical Issues:

   • Typo in model name (gpt-4o should be gpt-4)
   • Missing error handling in API calls

2. Code Quality:

   • Add docstrings to functions for better documentation
   • Consider adding type hints for better code maintainability
   • Add input validation beyond basic empty checks

3. Testing:

   • Consider adding example unit tests
   • Add integration test examples for calendar operations

4. Documentation:

   • Add example usage scenarios in readme.md
   • Include troubleshooting section in documentation
   • Document required Google Calendar permissions

The changes are safe to merge after addressing the critical issues. The example will be valuable for users looking to integrate calendar functionality.