Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WIP] remove getPtrElement #1296

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Dec 22, 2023
Merged

[WIP] remove getPtrElement #1296

merged 4 commits into from
Dec 22, 2023

Conversation

jumormt
Copy link
Contributor

@jumormt jumormt commented Dec 22, 2023

No description provided.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 22, 2023

Codecov Report

Attention: 4 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (5034678) 64.45% compared to head (3168159) 64.50%.
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1296      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   64.45%   64.50%   +0.05%     
==========================================
  Files         223      223              
  Lines       23870    23851      -19     
==========================================
  Hits        15386    15386              
+ Misses       8484     8465      -19     
Files Coverage Δ
svf-llvm/include/SVF-LLVM/LLVMUtil.h 73.68% <ø> (ø)
svf-llvm/lib/LLVMUtil.cpp 75.75% <ø> (+1.67%) ⬆️
svf/lib/MemoryModel/PointerAnalysis.cpp 58.96% <ø> (+0.46%) ⬆️
svf/lib/SVFIR/SVFType.cpp 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
svf/lib/SVFIR/SymbolTableInfo.cpp 53.55% <0.00%> (+0.50%) ⬆️
svf/lib/MemoryModel/AccessPath.cpp 3.19% <0.00%> (+0.06%) ⬆️

... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes

@yuleisui yuleisui merged commit 1195c8e into SVF-tools:master Dec 22, 2023
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants