Better manage stream channel activation. #124
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation:
Our existing model for working out whether a stream channel is active is
a bit too ad-hoc. We "activate" a stream channel once the initializer
has completed so long as the parent channel is active. This approach
is basically reasonable, but it makes it a bit hard to handle stream
closure.
Specifically, in the client case a stream channel may be "active" but
have never sent a frame. In this case we can (and must) close the stream
without sending a frame if the user requests closure. This means we
need to know whether or not the stream is actually open from the
perspective of the parent channel.
Modifications:
network
Result:
HTTP2StreamChannel will be more resilient to weird network behaviour.