Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Testing] Enabling more UI Tests by removing platform specific condition - 2 #27500

Open
wants to merge 28 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

LogishaSelvarajSF4525
Copy link
Contributor

Description of Change

The tests, previously added for specific platforms alone, now we are reviewed, and enabled the tests in all applicable platforms with the Appium framework. We are going to enable tests in blocks in different PRs. This is the 2nd group of tests enabled.

Test Cases:

  • Issue9951
  • Issue9580
  • Issue9075
  • Issue8715
  • Issue5765
  • Issue4782
  • Issue3001
  • Issue25371
  • Issue24878
  • Issue24847
  • Issue24741

Fixes #22902

@LogishaSelvarajSF4525 LogishaSelvarajSF4525 added area-testing Unit tests, device tests partner/syncfusion Issues / PR's with Syncfusion collaboration labels Jan 31, 2025
@dotnet-policy-service dotnet-policy-service bot added the community ✨ Community Contribution label Jan 31, 2025
@LogishaSelvarajSF4525 LogishaSelvarajSF4525 marked this pull request as ready for review February 3, 2025 06:05
@Copilot Copilot bot review requested due to automatic review settings February 3, 2025 06:05
@LogishaSelvarajSF4525 LogishaSelvarajSF4525 requested a review from a team as a code owner February 3, 2025 06:05

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot reviewed 13 out of 19 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

Files not reviewed (6)
  • src/Controls/tests/TestCases.Shared.Tests/Tests/Issues/Issue25371.cs: Evaluated as low risk
  • src/Controls/tests/TestCases.Shared.Tests/Tests/Issues/Issue4782.cs: Evaluated as low risk
  • src/Controls/tests/TestCases.Shared.Tests/Tests/Issues/Issue3001.cs: Evaluated as low risk
  • src/Controls/tests/TestCases.Shared.Tests/Tests/Issues/Issue9580.cs: Evaluated as low risk
  • src/Controls/tests/TestCases.Shared.Tests/Tests/Issues/Issue24878.cs: Evaluated as low risk
  • src/Controls/tests/TestCases.Shared.Tests/Tests/Issues/Issue5765.cs: Evaluated as low risk
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

src/Controls/tests/TestCases.Shared.Tests/Tests/Issues/Issue9951.cs:20

  • Changing the method signature from 'async Task' to 'void' without ensuring that all asynchronous operations are handled correctly could lead to unexpected behavior. Please ensure that 'VerifyScreenshot' does not handle any asynchronous operations internally. If it does, keep the method as 'async Task'.
public void SwitchColorTest()
@jsuarezruiz
Copy link
Contributor

/azp run

Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 3 pipeline(s).

@@ -25,5 +23,4 @@ public void BackgroundFrameResizesFastAndCorrectly()
VerifyScreenshot("BackgroundFrameResizesFastAndCorrectlySizeChanged");
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pending snapshot on Windows. Available on the latest build.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have committed this snapshot in the latest changes, but this method has two snapshots. I will add the first snapshot.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pending on Mac.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have committed this snapshot in the latest changes.

@jsuarezruiz
Copy link
Contributor

/azp run

Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 3 pipeline(s).

@@ -25,5 +23,4 @@ public void BackgroundFrameResizesFastAndCorrectly()
VerifyScreenshot("BackgroundFrameResizesFastAndCorrectlySizeChanged");
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pending on Mac.

@jsuarezruiz
Copy link
Contributor

/azp run

Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 3 pipeline(s).

Copy link
Contributor

@jsuarezruiz jsuarezruiz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Needs to update the macOS snapshots.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We've changed the logic for taking screenshots on macOS. It has been optimized, now instead of setting the App to full screen and taking the screenshot, we directly get the Window position and size and create a snapshot by cropping the App's content from the screen.

This requires re-committing the updated screenshot.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have updated the current Mac snapshots to reflect the latest changes.

@jsuarezruiz
Copy link
Contributor

/azp run

Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 3 pipeline(s).

@mattleibow
Copy link
Member

mattleibow commented Feb 12, 2025

/azp run

Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 3 pipeline(s).

Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 3 pipeline(s).

Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 3 pipeline(s).

@jsuarezruiz
Copy link
Contributor

/azp run

Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 3 pipeline(s).

@dotnet dotnet deleted a comment from azure-pipelines bot Feb 21, 2025
@jfversluis jfversluis self-assigned this Feb 23, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area-testing Unit tests, device tests community ✨ Community Contribution partner/syncfusion Issues / PR's with Syncfusion collaboration
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[TEST] Review all (UI) Tests and remove platform-specific runs where possible
4 participants