You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Consider the following stylistically problematic sentence:
As discussed by \cite{Source}, it could be argued...
Unless \textcite is used, textidote issues a warning. However, chktex complains about the whitespace before \cite and suggests to replace it with a non-breaking ~.
As discussed by~\cite{Source}, it could be argued...
This change to satisfy chktex will cause textidote to ignore the error, which seems to be undesired behaviour.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Apparently \textcite does not resolve the issue in the way I thought it does. It seems as though the biblatex commands like \parencite and \textcite are not recognized. Is it planned to include them in the check as well? E.g. allow only the following citation macros in-text:
\textcite
\citeauthor(*)
\citetitle (not common for citations, but could be used in-text in some cases)
Issue a warning for all other \cite variations. Maybe it's more complicated than it seems though.
Consider the following stylistically problematic sentence:
As discussed by \cite{Source}, it could be argued...
Unless
\textcite
is used, textidote issues a warning. However, chktex complains about the whitespace before\cite
and suggests to replace it with a non-breaking~
.As discussed by~\cite{Source}, it could be argued...
This change to satisfy chktex will cause textidote to ignore the error, which seems to be undesired behaviour.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: