Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs(readme): add Gitingest as an alternative tool for Python users #275

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 7, 2025

Conversation

yamadashy
Copy link
Owner

Checklist

  • Run npm run test
  • Run npm run lint

Copy link

stackblitz bot commented Jan 7, 2025

Review PR in StackBlitz Codeflow Run & review this pull request in StackBlitz Codeflow.

Copy link

cloudflare-workers-and-pages bot commented Jan 7, 2025

Deploying repomix with  Cloudflare Pages  Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit: 429081b
Status: ✅  Deploy successful!
Preview URL: https://bed0d339.repomix.pages.dev
Branch Preview URL: https://docs-readme-alternative-tool.repomix.pages.dev

View logs

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 7, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@yamadashy has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 53 minutes and 44 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 19a2677 and 429081b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a new section titled "Alternative Tools" in the README.md file. This addition provides information about Gitingest, an alternative tool for users working in the Python ecosystem and data science workflows. The change is purely documentational, expanding the README with additional context about similar tools without modifying any existing functionality of the project.

Changes

File Change Summary
README.md Added a new "Alternative Tools" section highlighting Gitingest as an alternative tool for Python and data science workflows

Possibly related PRs


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@yamadashy yamadashy force-pushed the docs/readme-alternative-tools branch from 564b217 to 19a2677 Compare January 7, 2025 13:53
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)

88-92: Consider enhancing the alternative tools section.

The section could be more helpful by including:

  • A brief comparison of features between Repomix and Gitingest
  • Specific scenarios where each tool excels
  • Any notable differences in functionality or approach

Example enhancement:

 ### Alternative Tools 🛠️

-If you're using Python, you might want to check out Gitingest, which is better suited for Python ecosystem and data science workflows.
+If you're working primarily with Python and data science workflows, consider [Gitingest](https://github.com/cyclotruc/gitingest). While Repomix focuses on general-purpose repository packing, Gitingest offers:
+- Native Python ecosystem integration
+- Specialized features for data science workflows
+- Python-specific code analysis capabilities
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.37.0)

92-92: null
Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 564b217 and 19a2677.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Markdownlint (0.37.0)
README.md

92-92: null
Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (6)
  • GitHub Check: Test (windows-latest, 22.x)
  • GitHub Check: Test (windows-latest, 20.x)
  • GitHub Check: Test (windows-latest, 18.x)
  • GitHub Check: Lint Renovate config
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
  • GitHub Check: Cloudflare Pages


If you're using Python, you might want to check out Gitingest, which is better suited for Python ecosystem and data science workflows.

https://github.com/cyclotruc/gitingest
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Format the URL as a Markdown link.

Convert the bare URL to a proper Markdown link for better readability and to comply with Markdown best practices.

-https://github.com/cyclotruc/gitingest
+[Gitingest Repository](https://github.com/cyclotruc/gitingest)
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
https://github.com/cyclotruc/gitingest
[Gitingest Repository](https://github.com/cyclotruc/gitingest)
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.37.0)

92-92: null
Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)

@yamadashy yamadashy force-pushed the docs/readme-alternative-tools branch from 19a2677 to 429081b Compare January 7, 2025 13:56
@yamadashy yamadashy merged commit 91a909c into main Jan 7, 2025
37 of 40 checks passed
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 7, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 92.00%. Comparing base (88c4d4f) to head (429081b).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #275   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.00%   92.00%           
=======================================
  Files          44       44           
  Lines        2140     2140           
  Branches      467      467           
=======================================
  Hits         1969     1969           
  Misses        171      171           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant