Refactor Styles & OutputGenerate functions to streamline generation process #129
Conversation
📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant changes to the output generation functionality in the codebase. It replaces existing direct style generation functions with template retrieval functions that utilize Handlebars for rendering. A new function, Changes
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
iNerdStack
changed the title
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (13)
tests/core/output/outputStyles/markdownStyle.test.ts (1)
26-27: LGTM! Consider documenting the new parameters.The test has been correctly updated to use
generateOutput, which aligns with the PR objectives. The removal of the separate context building step is consistent with the centralization of this logic.Could you please add a comment explaining the purpose of the two empty arrays passed to
generateOutput? This would improve the test's readability and maintainability.tests/core/output/outputStyles/xmlStyle.test.ts (1)
Line range hint
27-33: LGTM: Test implementation updated correctly with a suggestion.The test implementation has been updated to use the new
generateOutputfunction while maintaining the same assertions. This ensures that the refactoring doesn't change the expected output structure.Consider adding a new assertion to verify that the output is valid XML. This could provide an extra layer of confidence in the refactored code. For example:
expect(() => new DOMParser().parseFromString(output, "text/xml")).not.toThrow();This suggestion assumes you're running tests in an environment where
DOMParseris available. If not, consider using a lightweight XML validation library.tests/core/output/outputStyles/plainStyle.test.ts (2)
26-26: LGTM: Output generation simplified using centralized function.The change to use
generateOutputdirectly instead of separate context building and style generation functions aligns well with the PR objectives. This simplification makes the test more straightforward while still effectively checking the output content.Consider renaming the
outputvariable to something more specific likeplainOutputto enhance clarity:- const output = await generateOutput(process.cwd(), mockConfig, [], []); + const plainOutput = await generateOutput(process.cwd(), mockConfig, [], []); - expect(output).toContain('File Summary'); - expect(output).toContain('Repository Structure'); - expect(output).toContain('Custom header text'); - expect(output).toContain('Repository Files'); + expect(plainOutput).toContain('File Summary'); + expect(plainOutput).toContain('Repository Structure'); + expect(plainOutput).toContain('Custom header text'); + expect(plainOutput).toContain('Repository Files');
Line range hint
1-33: Consider adding a test for the centralized generation process.While the existing test effectively verifies the output content, it might be beneficial to add a test that specifically checks the behavior of the new centralized generation process. This could involve mocking the template retrieval and ensuring that the correct template is being used for the plain style.
Here's a suggestion for an additional test:
import { vi, expect, test } from 'vitest'; import { generateOutput } from '../../../../src/core/output/outputGenerate.js'; import { getPlainTemplate } from '../../../../src/core/output/outputStyles/plainStyle.js'; vi.mock('../../../../src/core/output/outputStyles/plainStyle.js'); test('generateOutput uses the correct template for plain style', async () => { const mockTemplate = 'Mock Plain Template'; (getPlainTemplate as jest.Mock).mockReturnValue(mockTemplate); const mockConfig = createMockConfig({ output: { style: 'plain', // ... other necessary config options }, }); await generateOutput(process.cwd(), mockConfig, [], []); expect(getPlainTemplate).toHaveBeenCalled(); });This test would verify that the
getPlainTemplatefunction is called when generating plain style output, ensuring that the centralized generation process is using the correct template.src/core/output/outputStyles/markdownStyle.ts (4)
3-5: Approve changes with a minor suggestion for improvementThe refactoring of the main function aligns well with the PR objectives. The separation of template definition from context creation and rendering improves the code's modularity and maintainability.
Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of this function, for example:
/** * Returns the Markdown template string for generating the output. * This template is used with Handlebars for rendering the final output. */ export const getMarkdownTemplate = () => { // ... (rest of the function)
Line range hint
5-52: Enhance template readability and maintainabilityThe template structure is comprehensive and well-organized. To further improve its readability and maintainability, consider the following suggestions:
- Break down the large template string into smaller, named template parts. This can make the code more modular and easier to maintain.
- Use constants for repeated strings or magic numbers.
- Consider using a linter or formatter specifically for Markdown to ensure consistent styling.
Here's an example of how you could refactor part of the template:
const FILE_SUMMARY_TEMPLATE = ` # File Summary ## Purpose {{{summaryPurpose}}} ## File Format {{{summaryFileFormat}}} 4. Multiple file entries, each consisting of: a. A header with the file path (## File: path/to/file) b. The full contents of the file in a code block ## Usage Guidelines {{{summaryUsageGuidelines}}} ## Notes {{{summaryNotes}}} `; const ADDITIONAL_INFO_TEMPLATE = ` ## Additional Info {{#if headerText}} ### User Provided Header {{{headerText}}} {{/if}} {{{summaryAdditionalInfo}}} `; export const getMarkdownTemplate = () => { return /* md */ ` {{{generationHeader}}} ${FILE_SUMMARY_TEMPLATE} ${ADDITIONAL_INFO_TEMPLATE} // ... rest of the template `; };This approach makes the main template more concise and allows for easier management of individual sections.
Line range hint
53-145: Consider optimizing thegetFileExtensionhelper functionWhile the
getFileExtensionfunction remains unchanged and serves its purpose well, there are a few potential optimizations and improvements to consider:
- Move this function to a separate utility file to promote reusability across different style templates.
- Use a Map or object literal for faster lookups instead of a switch statement.
- Consider using a more descriptive name like
getLanguageIdentifierto better reflect its purpose.Here's an example of how you could refactor this function:
// In a new file, e.g., src/utils/languageUtils.ts const EXTENSION_TO_LANGUAGE = new Map([ ['js', 'javascript'], ['jsx', 'javascript'], ['ts', 'typescript'], ['tsx', 'typescript'], // ... (add all other mappings) ]); export const getLanguageIdentifier = (filePath: string): string => { const extension = filePath.split('.').pop()?.toLowerCase() || ''; return EXTENSION_TO_LANGUAGE.get(extension) || ''; }; // In markdownStyle.ts import { getLanguageIdentifier } from '../../utils/languageUtils'; Handlebars.registerHelper('getLanguageIdentifier', getLanguageIdentifier);This approach would improve performance for large numbers of files and make the code more maintainable. It also allows for easier extension of language support in the future.
Line range hint
1-145: Overall assessment of changesThe refactoring of this file aligns well with the PR objectives of streamlining the generation process and eliminating duplication. The main improvements are:
- Separation of concerns: The template definition is now separate from context creation and rendering.
- Improved modularity: The
getMarkdownTemplatefunction now focuses solely on providing the template string.- Consistency with other style files: This change likely makes the Markdown style consistent with other output styles.
These changes should make the code more maintainable and easier to extend in the future. However, there are still opportunities for further improvements:
- Breaking down the large template string into smaller, named parts for better readability and maintainability.
- Optimizing and potentially relocating the
getFileExtensionhelper function.- Adding more descriptive comments to explain the purpose and usage of the main function.
Consider creating a consistent structure across all style files (Markdown, XML, Plain) to further improve the overall architecture of the output generation system. This could involve creating a common interface or abstract class that all style generators implement, ensuring a uniform approach to template generation across different output formats.
src/core/output/outputStyles/xmlStyle.ts (3)
1-1: Add explicit return type annotation to thegetXmlTemplatefunctionCurrently, the
getXmlTemplatefunction lacks an explicit return type annotation. Adding a return type improves code readability and assists with type checking.Consider specifying the return type as
string:-export const getXmlTemplate = () => { +export const getXmlTemplate = (): string => {
Line range hint
5-59: Potential XML injection vulnerability due to unescaped variablesThe template uses triple mustaches
{{{...}}}to insert variables into the XML output without escaping. If any of the variables (e.g.,generationHeader,summaryPurpose,this.content, etc.) contain untrusted or user-generated content, this could introduce XML injection vulnerabilities or result in invalid XML if special characters are present.Consider replacing triple mustaches with double mustaches
{{...}}to ensure content is properly escaped. For example:-<purpose> -{{{summaryPurpose}}} -</purpose> +<purpose> +{{summaryPurpose}} +</purpose>Ensure that all variables are appropriately escaped to prevent security issues and maintain valid XML output.
Line range hint
25-28: Fix inconsistent numbering in the<file_format>sectionIn the
<file_format>section, the text starts with "4. Repository files," but there are no preceding numbered items from 1 to 3. This could confuse users reading the generated XML. Ensure that the numbering is consistent or remove the numbering if it's unnecessary.Consider revising the section as follows:
-{{{summaryFileFormat}}} -4. Repository files, each consisting of: +{{{summaryFileFormat}}} +Repository files, each consisting of:src/core/output/outputStyles/plainStyle.ts (2)
Line range hint
14-19: Consistency Issue with Numbering in 'File Format' SectionIn the 'File Format' section of the template, the numbering begins with
4. Multiple file entries.... If{{{summaryFileFormat}}}does not include items labeled1.to3., starting at4.may be confusing to users. Please ensure that the numbering is sequential and logical within the context.
Line range hint
6-70: Review Use of Unescaped Handlebars Expressions{{{ ... }}}The template utilizes unescaped Handlebars expressions like
{{{generationHeader}}}and{{{summaryPurpose}}}. While this allows raw content insertion without HTML escaping, it can pose security risks if the data contains untrusted input. Ensure that all variables used with unescaped expressions are sanitized appropriately. If HTML unescaping is not necessary, consider using the standard escaped expressions{{ ... }}to mitigate potential injection attacks.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
- src/core/output/outputGenerate.ts (2 hunks)
- src/core/output/outputStyles/markdownStyle.ts (2 hunks)
- src/core/output/outputStyles/plainStyle.ts (2 hunks)
- src/core/output/outputStyles/xmlStyle.ts (2 hunks)
- tests/core/output/outputStyles/markdownStyle.test.ts (3 hunks)
- tests/core/output/outputStyles/plainStyle.test.ts (3 hunks)
- tests/core/output/outputStyles/xmlStyle.test.ts (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (12)
tests/core/output/outputStyles/markdownStyle.test.ts (3)
13-13: LGTM! Test name updated correctly.The test case name has been appropriately updated to reflect the use of
generateOutputfor markdown style, maintaining clarity about the test's purpose.
Line range hint
1-34: Overall, the changes effectively adapt the test to the new architecture.The modifications in this file successfully align the test with the PR objectives of centralizing the output generation process. The test maintains its original purpose of verifying markdown style output while accommodating the new
generateOutputfunction. These changes contribute to reducing duplication and streamlining the generation process as intended.
3-3: LGTM! Verify removal of unused import.The import statement has been correctly updated to use
generateOutputfrom the new location, which aligns with the PR objectives of centralizing the output generation process.Let's verify that
buildOutputGeneratorContextis no longer used in this file:tests/core/output/outputStyles/xmlStyle.test.ts (3)
4-4: LGTM: Import statement updated correctly.The import statement has been updated to reflect the centralization of the output generation process. This change aligns with the PR objectives of streamlining the generation process.
14-14: LGTM: Test case name updated appropriately.The test case name has been updated to reflect the new function name while still specifying the output style being tested. This change improves clarity and aligns with the refactoring changes.
Line range hint
1-33: Overall assessment: Changes successfully implement the refactoring objectives.The modifications to this test file accurately reflect the refactoring of the output generation process. The test maintains its effectiveness while adapting to the new centralized
generateOutputfunction. The consistency in assertions ensures that the output structure remains unchanged, which is crucial for backwards compatibility.To ensure that all XML style related tests have been updated consistently, run the following script:
This script will help identify any missed updates in other XML-related test files, if they exist.
✅ Verification successful
Action Required: Correct and rerun the verification script to ensure all XML style related tests use the new
generateOutputfunction.
Action Required: Update and rerun the verification script to ensure all XML style related tests use the new
generateOutputfunction.
Verification Successful: All XML style related tests are using the new
generateOutputfunction.No remaining references to
generateXmlStylewere found in the test files, ensuring that the refactoring is complete and consistent across the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all XML style related tests use the new generateOutput function # Test: Search for any remaining references to generateXmlStyle in test files rg --type typescript 'generateXmlStyle' tests/Length of output: 81
Script:
# #!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all XML style related tests use the new generateOutput function # Test: Search for any remaining references to generateXmlStyle in test files rg --type=ts 'generateXmlStyle' tests/Length of output: 38
Script:
# #!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all XML style related tests use the new generateOutput function # Test: Search for any remaining references to generateXmlStyle in test files rg 'generateXmlStyle' --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx' tests/Length of output: 57
tests/core/output/outputStyles/plainStyle.test.ts (2)
3-3: LGTM: Import statement updated to reflect refactored structure.The change from importing specific functions to importing only
generateOutputaligns well with the PR objectives of centralizing template compilation and rendering. This modification supports the goal of streamlining the generation process.
13-13: LGTM: Test case name updated to reflect new function structure.The test case name has been appropriately updated to use
generateOutput for plaininstead ofgeneratePlainOutput. This change accurately reflects the new unifiedgenerateOutputfunction while still clearly indicating that it's testing the plain style output.src/core/output/outputStyles/plainStyle.ts (2)
Line range hint
4-70: Good Abstraction and Improved ModularityThe introduction of the
getPlainTemplatefunction cleanly encapsulates the template string for plain style outputs. This enhances modularity and reusability, aligning with best practices and simplifying the output generation process.
Line range hint
4-70: Ensure All References togeneratePlainStyleAre UpdatedThe function
generatePlainStylehas been removed and replaced withgetPlainTemplate. Verify that all references togeneratePlainStyleacross the codebase, including imports and calls, have been updated to prevent any runtime errors.You can use the following script to identify any remaining references:
✅ Verification successful
All references to
generatePlainStylehave been successfully updated. No remaining references found.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find any references to `generatePlainStyle` in the codebase. rg --type javascript 'generatePlainStyle'Length of output: 76
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find any references to `generatePlainStyle` in the JavaScript codebase. rg --type js 'generatePlainStyle'Length of output: 33
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find any references to `generatePlainStyle` across various file types in the codebase. # Search in JavaScript, TypeScript, JSX, and TSX files rg --type js --type ts --type jsx --type tsx 'generatePlainStyle' # General search without specifying file type rg 'generatePlainStyle'Length of output: 117
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find any references to `generatePlainStyle` across the entire codebase without specifying file types. rg 'generatePlainStyle'Length of output: 23
src/core/output/outputGenerate.ts (2)
3-3: Verify that Handlebars is properly added to project dependencies.The import of Handlebars introduces a new dependency to the project. Please ensure that Handlebars is included in the project's
package.jsonfile under the dependencies section, and that the application environment is compatible with the Handlebars version used.
22-38: Introduction ofcreateRenderContextimproves code modularity.The new
createRenderContextfunction organizes the construction of the render context, enhancing code readability and maintainability by separating concerns. This refactoring aligns with best practices and makes future extensions easier.
| switch (config.output.style) { | ||
| case 'xml': | ||
| output = generateXmlStyle(outputGeneratorContext); | ||
| template = getXmlTemplate(); | ||
| break; | ||
| case 'markdown': | ||
| output = generateMarkdownStyle(outputGeneratorContext); | ||
| template = getMarkdownTemplate(); | ||
| break; | ||
| default: | ||
| output = generatePlainStyle(outputGeneratorContext); | ||
| template = getPlainTemplate(); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Handle unexpected output styles explicitly.
In the switch statement for config.output.style, unrecognized styles default to the plain template. Consider throwing an error or warning when an unsupported style is specified to alert users of potential misconfigurations.
|
@iNerdStack I'll review the changes in detail when I get home. Thanks again for your contribution to Repopack! |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #129 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 76.40% 76.01% -0.39%
==========================================
Files 36 36
Lines 1653 1618 -35
Branches 266 267 +1
==========================================
- Hits 1263 1230 -33
+ Misses 390 388 -2 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
src/core/output/outputStyles/xmlStyle.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-60: Summary of XML Style ChangesThe refactoring of
xmlStyle.tsintroduces a simpler, more readable approach to XML template generation. However, there are several important points to address:
- Consider reintroducing type safety by adding a context parameter to
getXmlTemplate.- Implement input validation or escaping for all placeholders to prevent XML injection vulnerabilities.
- Enhance the XML structure by adding a version declaration and a root element.
- Ensure consistent naming conventions throughout the XML template.
These changes will improve the security, maintainability, and consistency of the XML output generation. Please review and implement these suggestions to enhance the overall quality of the code.
src/core/output/outputStyles/plainStyle.ts (1)
Line range hint
4-69: Implementation looks good, with some suggestions for improvement.The new
getPlainTemplatefunction successfully encapsulates the template structure for plain text output. The template covers all necessary sections and uses Handlebars syntax for dynamic content, which aligns well with the refactoring goals.Consider the following improvements:
- Use a template literal tag for better maintainability. This can help with syntax highlighting and potential preprocessing. For example:
import { dedent } from 'some-dedent-library'; export const getPlainTemplate = () => dedent` {{{generationHeader}}} ${PLAIN_LONG_SEPARATOR} File Summary ${PLAIN_LONG_SEPARATOR} // ... rest of the template `;
- Add a comment or documentation noting the required context variables for this template. This will help developers using this template to ensure they provide all necessary data. For example:
/** * Returns the plain text template for output generation. * * Required context variables: * - generationHeader * - summaryPurpose * - summaryFileFormat * - summaryUsageGuidelines * - summaryNotes * - summaryAdditionalInfo * - treeString * - processedFiles (array of {path, content}) * * Optional context variables: * - headerText * - instruction */ export const getPlainTemplate = () => { // ... template string };These changes will enhance the maintainability and usability of the template.
src/core/output/outputGenerate.ts (1)
21-37: LGTM: Well-structuredcreateRenderContextfunctionThe
createRenderContextfunction effectively encapsulates the creation of the render context, improving code organization and reusability. It aligns well with the refactoring goals by utilizing the imported summary generation functions.Consider adding JSDoc comments to describe the function's purpose and return value, enhancing code documentation:
/** * Creates a render context for template generation. * @param {OutputGeneratorContext} outputGeneratorContext - The context for output generation. * @returns {Object} An object containing all necessary information for template rendering. */ const createRenderContext = (outputGeneratorContext: OutputGeneratorContext) => { // ... existing implementation ... };
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
- src/core/output/outputGenerate.ts (2 hunks)
- src/core/output/outputStyles/markdownStyle.ts (2 hunks)
- src/core/output/outputStyles/plainStyle.ts (2 hunks)
- src/core/output/outputStyles/xmlStyle.ts (2 hunks)
- tests/core/output/outputStyles/markdownStyle.test.ts (3 hunks)
- tests/core/output/outputStyles/xmlStyle.test.ts (3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- src/core/output/outputStyles/markdownStyle.ts
- tests/core/output/outputStyles/markdownStyle.test.ts
- tests/core/output/outputStyles/xmlStyle.test.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (9)
src/core/output/outputStyles/xmlStyle.ts (3)
Line range hint
1-60: Potential security risk with unvalidated placeholdersThe new implementation uses placeholders (e.g.,
{{{summaryPurpose}}}) without explicit input validation. This could lead to XML injection vulnerabilities if the data isn't properly sanitized before insertion.Consider implementing input validation or escaping for all placeholders to prevent potential XML injection attacks. You could create a helper function to sanitize the input:
function sanitizeXml(input: string): string { return input.replace(/[<>&'"]/g, (char) => { switch (char) { case '<': return '<'; case '>': return '>'; case '&': return '&'; case "'": return '''; case '"': return '"'; default: return char; } }); }Then use this function for all placeholders in the template:
<purpose> ${sanitizeXml(summaryPurpose)} </purpose>Let's check if there are any existing security measures for XML output:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for existing XML sanitization or escaping functions # Expected result: Existing functions for XML escaping or sanitization # Search for functions related to XML escaping or sanitization rg -i "function.*(?:escape|sanitize).*xml" --type typescript # Check for usage of libraries that might handle XML escaping rg -i "import.*xml" --type typescript
Line range hint
1-60: Well-structured XML template with clear sectionsThe XML structure is well-organized with clear sections for file summary, repository structure, and repository files. The use of conditional rendering for optional sections (e.g.,
headerTextandinstruction) is a good practice.However, consider the following improvements:
Add XML version and encoding declaration at the beginning of the template:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>Wrap the entire content in a root element for better XML structure:
<repository_summary> <!-- Existing content here --> </repository_summary>Use consistent naming conventions for elements. Currently, you mix snake_case and camelCase. Stick to one style, preferably snake_case for XML:
<user_provided_header> instead of <userProvidedHeader>Here's a snippet of the suggested changes:
export const getXmlTemplate = () => { return /* xml */ ` +<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> +<repository_summary> {{{generationHeader}}} <file_summary> <!-- Existing content --> </file_summary> <!-- Other sections --> {{#if instruction}} <instruction> {{{instruction}}} </instruction> {{/if}} +</repository_summary> `; };Let's check if there are any existing XML structures in the codebase that we should align with:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for existing XML structures in the codebase # Expected result: Consistent XML structures across the project # Search for XML structures in TypeScript files rg -i "<\?xml" --type typescript # Check for root elements in XML structures rg -i "<[^?].*>.*</.*>" --type typescript
Line range hint
1-60: Significant change in XML generation approachThe refactoring from
generateXmlStyletogetXmlTemplaterepresents a shift from dynamic template compilation to a static template string. While this simplifies the code, it has some implications:
- The function no longer accepts an
OutputGeneratorContextparameter, which might affect type safety and make the function less flexible.- The static approach could potentially impact performance for large repositories, as the entire template is stored in memory.
Consider adding a parameter for the template context to maintain type safety and flexibility:
export const getXmlTemplate = (context: OutputGeneratorContext) => { // Use context to validate or process placeholders if needed return /* xml */ `...`; };To assess the impact of this change on large repositories, we can check for any existing large XML outputs:
✅ Verification successful
No large XML files detected; performance impact is unlikely.
The verification confirms that there are no unusually large XML files in the repository that could impact performance.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for large XML outputs in the repository # Expected result: No unusually large XML files, which would indicate potential performance issues # Search for XML files larger than 1MB find . -name "*.xml" -type f -size +1M -exec ls -lh {} \; # If large XML files exist, examine their content find . -name "*.xml" -type f -size +1M -exec head -n 20 {} \;Length of output: 330
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for large XML outputs in the repository # Expected result: No unusually large XML files, which would indicate potential performance issues # Search for XML files larger than 1MB find . -name "*.xml" -type f -size +1M -exec ls -lh {} \; # If large XML files exist, examine their content find . -name "*.xml" -type f -size +1M -exec head -n 20 {} \;Length of output: 129
src/core/output/outputStyles/plainStyle.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-69: Changes align well with PR objectivesThe refactoring of
plainStyle.tssuccessfully achieves the goal of eliminating the duplication ofrenderContextand enhancing the generation process. By replacing thegeneratePlainStylefunction withgetPlainTemplate, the file now focuses solely on providing the template structure, allowing for centralized context creation and rendering elsewhere in the codebase.This change contributes to a more modular and maintainable architecture, as it separates the concerns of template definition from context creation and rendering. The new implementation should integrate well with the changes mentioned in the PR objectives, particularly the introduction of
createRenderContextand centralized template compilation inoutputGenerate.ts.To ensure consistency across style files, let's verify if similar changes have been applied to other style files:
This will help confirm that the refactoring has been consistently applied across all output styles.
✅ Verification successful
Re-running the verification to check other style files for
getTemplatefunctions:
Verification Successful: Consistent Refactoring Across Style Files
The refactoring of
plainStyle.tsaligns with the PR objectives by eliminating duplication ofrenderContextand enhancing the generation process through thegetPlainTemplatefunction. The shell script confirmed that similarget*Templatefunctions (getXmlTemplate,getMarkdownTemplate) are present in all other style files withinsrc/core/output/outputStyles, ensuring consistency and maintainability across the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if other style files have been updated similarly # Test: Look for getTemplate functions in other style files echo "Checking for getTemplate functions in other style files:" rg --type typescript 'export const get\w+Template' src/core/output/outputStylesLength of output: 239
Script:
# Description: Check if other style files have been updated similarly # Test: Look for getTemplate functions in other style files echo "Checking for getTemplate functions in other style files:" rg 'export const get\w+Template' src/core/output/outputStyles --glob '*.ts'Length of output: 451
src/core/output/outputGenerate.ts (5)
3-19: LGTM: New imports support template-based approachThe new imports, including Handlebars and various summary generation functions, align well with the PR objectives. They support the centralization of template compilation and rendering, which should help streamline the output generation process.
46-61: LGTM: Improved output generation using templatesThe changes to the
generateOutputfunction effectively implement the template-based approach using Handlebars. This aligns well with the PR objectives of centralizing template compilation and rendering, which should improve maintainability and reduce code duplication.
Line range hint
64-92: LGTM: UnchangedbuildOutputGeneratorContextfunctionThe
buildOutputGeneratorContextfunction remains unchanged and continues to work well with the newcreateRenderContextfunction. This preserves the existing functionality while allowing for the new template-based approach.
60-61:⚠️ Potential issueAdd error handling for template compilation and rendering
While the implementation looks good, it's important to add error handling for the template compilation and rendering process. Handlebars operations can fail if there are issues with the template or context data.
Consider wrapping the compilation and rendering in a try-catch block:
try { const compiledTemplate = Handlebars.compile(template); return `${compiledTemplate(renderContext).trim()}\n`; } catch (error) { throw new RepopackError(`Failed to compile or render template: ${error.message}`); }
48-58:⚠️ Potential issueHandle unexpected output styles explicitly
While the switch statement has been updated to use the new template retrieval functions, it still defaults to the plain template for unrecognized styles without any warning or error.
Consider adding explicit handling for unexpected styles:
switch (config.output.style) { case 'xml': template = getXmlTemplate(); break; case 'markdown': template = getMarkdownTemplate(); break; case 'plain': template = getPlainTemplate(); break; default: console.warn(`Unsupported output style: ${config.output.style}. Defaulting to plain.`); template = getPlainTemplate(); }This change will alert users to potential misconfigurations while maintaining the current fallback behavior.
|
@iNerdStack I'll merge this. Thanks! |
This refactor fixes the duplication of renderContext and the generation process for each style while maintaining functionality.
All Changes
Modified
outputGenerate.ts:createRenderContextfunctiongenerateOutputfunctionplainStyle.ts,xmlStyle.ts, andmarkdownStyle.tsnow return template stringsUpdated tests to reflect new changes:
All existing tests have been updated, passed and manually tested to ensure output remains consistent with previous versions
related: #125