feat(style): Add Markdown output style #87
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes introduce a new output format, Markdown, to the Repopack tool, enhancing its functionality. A new Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
yamadashy
force-pushed
the
feature/markdown-style
branch
3 times, most recently
from
1e95de8 to
9a2caf1
Compare
yamadashy
force-pushed
the
feature/markdown-style
branch
from
9a2caf1 to
cd16787
Compare
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (8)
src/config/configTypes.ts (1)
1-1: LGTM! Consider using an enum for better type safety.The addition of 'markdown' to the
RepopackOutputStyletype is correct and aligns with the PR objective. This change successfully introduces Markdown as a new output style option.For better type safety and easier future additions, consider refactoring this type to an enum:
export enum RepopackOutputStyle { Plain = 'plain', XML = 'xml', Markdown = 'markdown' }This approach would provide better autocomplete support and make it easier to add new styles in the future.
tests/core/output/markdownStyleGenerator.test.ts (1)
14-27: LGTM: Test case setup is comprehensive.The test case is well-structured with a detailed mock configuration. Using
createMockConfigis a good practice for creating consistent test configurations.Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of each configuration option in the mock config. This would improve the readability and maintainability of the test. For example:
const mockConfig = createMockConfig({ output: { filePath: 'output.md', // Specify output file path style: 'markdown', // Set output style to markdown headerText: 'Custom header text', // Test custom header text topFilesLength: 2, // Limit top files list to 2 entries showLineNumbers: false, // Disable line numbers in output removeComments: false, // Keep comments in output removeEmptyLines: false, // Keep empty lines in output }, });src/core/output/outputGenerator.ts (1)
25-27: LGTM: New case for Markdown style output.The new case for 'markdown' is correctly implemented and follows the existing pattern in the switch statement. It appropriately calls the
generateMarkdownStylefunction with theoutputGeneratorContext.For consistency with the 'xml' case, consider adding a comment above the 'markdown' case:
case 'xml': output = generateXmlStyle(outputGeneratorContext); break; + // Markdown style case 'markdown': output = generateMarkdownStyle(outputGeneratorContext); break;src/core/output/markdownStyleGenerator.ts (2)
12-32: LGTM: Well-structured function with a minor suggestion.The
generateMarkdownStylefunction is well-implemented, following the single responsibility principle and promoting code reuse through utility functions. TherenderContextobject is comprehensive, covering all necessary aspects of the output.Consider adding a return type annotation to the function for improved readability and type safety:
- export const generateMarkdownStyle = (outputGeneratorContext: OutputGeneratorContext) => { + export const generateMarkdownStyle = (outputGeneratorContext: OutputGeneratorContext): string => {
34-81: LGTM: Well-structured Markdown template with a suggestion for improvement.The Markdown template is comprehensive and well-organized, covering all necessary sections for the output. The use of Handlebars syntax for dynamic content and conditional rendering is appropriate.
Consider moving the
markdownTemplateto a separate file (e.g.,markdownTemplate.ts) to improve code organization and maintainability. This separation of concerns would make the main file cleaner and the template easier to manage independently. You could then import it like this:import { markdownTemplate } from './markdownTemplate.js';This approach would also make it easier to add different templates in the future if needed.
src/core/output/plainStyleGenerator.ts (2)
40-40: Approved: Improved template string usageThe change from Handlebars syntax to string interpolation for separators is a good improvement. It simplifies the template and makes it more readable by directly using the constants.
Consider using template literals for multi-line strings consistently throughout the file. For example, you could rewrite the
plainTemplatedeclaration as:const plainTemplate = ` {{{generationHeader}}} ${PLAIN_LONG_SEPARATOR} File Summary ${PLAIN_LONG_SEPARATOR} // ... rest of the template ... `;This would make the code style more consistent and potentially more readable.
Also applies to: 42-42, 76-76, 78-78, 83-83, 86-86, 88-88, 94-94, 96-96
Line range hint
1-96: Overall changes look good with a minor suggestionThe refactoring improves code organization by moving constants to the file level and simplifying the template usage. These changes maintain the existing functionality while making the code more readable and potentially more maintainable.
For consistency, consider using template literals for all string declarations in this file. For example:
const PLAIN_SEPARATOR = `${'='.repeat(16)}`; const PLAIN_LONG_SEPARATOR = `${'='.repeat(64)}`;This would make the string declarations consistent throughout the file, although the current implementation is also perfectly valid.
README.md (1)
226-264: LGTM: Markdown Format section added successfullyThe new Markdown Format section is well-structured and provides clear, accurate information about the new output format. The example command, format description, and code block effectively illustrate how to use and understand the Markdown output.
For consistency with the XML Format section, consider adding a brief note about the potential benefits of using Markdown format with AI systems, similar to the XML section's mention of XML tags in AI contexts.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
- .gitignore (1 hunks)
- README.md (2 hunks)
- src/cli/cliRunner.ts (1 hunks)
- src/config/configTypes.ts (1 hunks)
- src/core/output/markdownStyleGenerator.ts (1 hunks)
- src/core/output/outputGenerator.ts (2 hunks)
- src/core/output/plainStyleGenerator.ts (2 hunks)
- src/core/output/xmlStyleGenerator.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/core/output/markdownStyleGenerator.test.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md
[uncategorized] ~267-~267: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ... Command Line Options --v, --version: Show tool version - `-o, --output <file...(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)
🔇 Additional comments (15)
.gitignore (1)
27-27: LGTM: Appropriate addition to .gitignoreThe addition of
repopack-output.mdto the .gitignore file is correct and consistent with the existing entries for other repopack output formats. This change ensures that the newly introduced Markdown output files are not tracked by Git, which is the desired behavior for generated files.tests/core/output/markdownStyleGenerator.test.ts (3)
1-7: LGTM: Imports and mocks are well-structured.The necessary imports for testing are present, and mocking
fs/promisesis a good practice to isolate the test from file system operations.
9-13: LGTM: Test suite setup is correct.The test suite is properly defined, and the
beforeEachhook ensures that all mocks are reset before each test, which is a good practice for test isolation.
1-34: Overall, good test structure with room for improvement.The test file for the markdown style generator is well-structured and covers the basic functionality. However, there are opportunities to enhance the test coverage and improve its robustness:
- Add comments to explain the purpose of each configuration option in the mock config.
- Expand the assertions to verify more aspects of the generated output, including the custom header text and the structure of each section.
- Consider adding more test cases to cover different scenarios and edge cases.
These improvements will increase confidence in the correctness of the markdown style generator and make the tests more maintainable.
src/core/output/outputGenerator.ts (2)
7-7: LGTM: Import statement for Markdown style generator.The import statement for
generateMarkdownStyleis correctly placed and follows the existing conventions in the file. Good job on including the file extension, which is a best practice for ES modules.
Line range hint
13-31: Verify documentation and tests for the new Markdown style.The changes to support the Markdown output style have been implemented cleanly. To ensure completeness:
- Verify that the project documentation (e.g., README, user guide) has been updated to mention the new Markdown output option.
- Ensure that appropriate tests have been added or updated to cover the Markdown output generation.
Run the following script to check for potential documentation and test updates:
src/core/output/xmlStyleGenerator.ts (1)
34-34: LGTM! Improved developer experience with XML tag.The addition of the
/* xml */comment before the template string is a good practice. This tag is likely used for syntax highlighting in IDEs or potentially for XML-specific processing. It improves code readability and developer experience without affecting the runtime behavior.src/core/output/markdownStyleGenerator.ts (2)
1-10: LGTM: Imports are well-structured and relevant.The import statements are clean, following TypeScript best practices. All imported modules and functions appear to be used in the file, contributing to the Markdown style generation.
1-81: Great implementation of the Markdown output style generator!This new file successfully implements the Markdown output style for the Repopack project, as outlined in the PR objectives. The code is well-structured, follows TypeScript best practices, and effectively uses the Handlebars templating engine to generate the desired output.
Key strengths:
- Clear separation of concerns between imports, main function, and template.
- Effective use of utility functions for generating various sections of the output.
- Well-organized Markdown template covering all required sections.
The implementation aligns well with the goal of introducing a new Markdown output style, providing users with an additional option for formatting their repository content. This enhancement will indeed improve the presentation of repository information by allowing Markdown formatting.
src/core/output/plainStyleGenerator.ts (1)
34-35: Good refactoring: Constants moved outside the functionMoving the
PLAIN_SEPARATORandPLAIN_LONG_SEPARATORconstants outside the function is a good practice. It improves code organization and potentially allows for reuse if needed in the future.src/cli/cliRunner.ts (1)
42-42: LGTM! Verify related changes.The addition of "markdown" to the
--styleoption description is correct and aligns with the PR objective of adding a new Markdown output style.To ensure full implementation, please verify the following:
Check if the
RepopackOutputStyletype has been updated:Check if other parts of the codebase support the new "markdown" style:
Check if documentation has been updated:
README.md (4)
272-272: LGTM: Command line option updated correctlyThe
--styleoption has been correctly updated to includemarkdownas a valid choice, alongsideplainandxml. This change accurately reflects the new Markdown output format feature.
332-332: LGTM: Configuration option updated correctlyThe
output.styleoption in the configuration table has been properly updated to includemarkdownas a valid choice, alongsideplainandxml. This change is consistent with the new Markdown output format feature.
267-267: Ignore static analysis hint for punctuationThe static analysis tool flagged a potential issue with loose punctuation in the Command Line Options section. However, this appears to be a false positive. The current formatting is intentional and consistent with the style used throughout the list of options. Changing it would likely reduce readability and disrupt the document's consistency.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~267-~267: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ... Command Line Options --v, --version: Show tool version - `-o, --output <file...(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)
Line range hint
226-332: Overall: Excellent addition of Markdown output format documentationThe changes to the README.md file successfully introduce and document the new Markdown output format for Repopack. The updates are comprehensive, well-integrated, and maintain the document's overall consistency and clarity. The new Markdown Format section provides valuable information to users, and the command line and configuration options have been correctly updated to reflect this new feature.
Great job on enhancing the documentation to support this new functionality!
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~267-~267: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ... Command Line Options --v, --version: Show tool version - `-o, --output <file...(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)
This PR introduces a new Markdown output style for Repopack, providing users with an additional option for formatting their repository content.
related: #86
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Documentation
Tests